Communication Commission: gov’t proposed changes for electronic communications ‘no threat’ to media freedom
The opposition is against the changes to the law on communications. Photo: aphaia.co.uk.
Tweet 
Share
The Communications Commission, a regulatory body in the broadcasting and electronic communications field, has dismissed allegations that the government’s proposed changes to the law on electronic communications are a threat to media freedom.
The bill allows the commission to appoint its representative as a head of authorised entities in the electronic communications field if the entity refuses to pay a fine or enforce the decisions made by the commission.
The representative will be able to run the entity for two years and will be accountable only before the commission if the bill is approved by the parliament with at least 76 votes (in the 150-member legislative body where the ruling party has 92 MPs).
The opposition has called the bill ‘draconian, which will allow the government to interfere in the activities of media outlets prior to the upcoming, autumn parliamentary elections.’
Head of Journalist Ethics Charter Mariam Gogosashvili said that the bill, when adopted, may be ‘misinterpreted by the commission’ and it may appoint its representative (as a manager) to the regional broadcasters which are Internet, mobile-based (multiflex operators).
The Communication Commission says that the bill ‘has nothing to do with the media or broadcasting.’
The bill does not concern the Law on Broadcasting and has nothing to do with the media and broadcasting. The amendments are for the Law on Electronic Communications and concerns mobile and internet providers,” said the commission.
The commission claims that the bill will ensure the effective enforcement of its decisions in the electronic communications field.
The 2020 World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders says that ‘Georgia’s media are pluralist but still very polarized,’ adding that the reforms of recent years have brought improvements in media ownership transparency and satellite TV pluralism,’ but owners still often call the shots on editorial content.’
Georgia comes in 60th of 180 countries in the 2019 World Press Freedom Index by the international, non-profit organisation Reporters Without Borders, which promotes and defends the freedom of information and the press.
International, non-profit organisation Reporters Without Borders, which promotes and defends freedom of information and the press, has upgraded Georgia’s freedom of press index by three points.
French-based, international non-profit organisation Reporters without Borders (RWB) has released its annual 2016 World Press Freedom Index which revealed Georgia has progressed in terms of media freedom and transparency in recent years.
The parliament of Georgia has today approved amendments to the Law of Georgia on Competition that sets the principles for protecting free and fair competition from unlawful restrictions in order to spur on the development of free trade and a competitive market.
Part of the amendments to Law of Georgia on Competition that sets the principles for protecting free and fair competition from unlawful restrictions in order to spur on the development of free trade and a competitive market, are coming into force today, announces Georgian Competition Agency.
A study into how information is acquired by citizens of Georgia, as well as their attitudes to its sources, says the local information ecosystem is "rich and plural", however "many challenges" remain in the field.
Georgia has maintained its 60th spot out of 180 countries in the latest World Press Freedom Index from Reporters Without Borders (RSF), with the country's media landscape called "pluralist but not yet independent" by the organisation.
The EU and US ambassadors to Georgia have congratulated Georgian journalists on World Press Freedom Day.
Irakli Kobakhidze, the head of the ruling Georgian Dream party, on Thursday reacted to controversy over planned amendments to the Law on Broadcasting, aimed at “preventing hate speech and incitement to terrorism” by claiming the bill, approved by the Parliament in its first reading this week, was a “directive of the European Union”.